OUR BLOG

Energy Insights, by Fairbanks Energy, examines a wide variety of topics within the energy sector. We discuss industry trends, compile the latest news, feature recent projects, highlight company updates, and give our own engineers a platform to answer questions within the field of energy conservation. 

View the blog

 

LED vs. Fluorescent: Who Lights Up Better

Posted on March 14, 2017

incandescent-72139_1280-408403-edited-773302-edited.jpg

Long before the invention of LED technology, the incandscent bulb helped to launch the era of modern lighting. Many improvements were made to incandescent bulbs over time, but researchers had still only figured out how to convert about 10% of the energy used into light. In the early 1900’s, Peter Cooper Hewitt created one of the precursors to the fluorescent lamp and this lighting solution developed from that point.

By the mid-century, researchers began to focus their investigative efforts on even better solutions due to a need for more efficient lighting that arose during World War II. As a result, by the 1950s there were more fluorescent lamps producing light than incandescents in the U.S. While fluorescents were an improvement, the light produced had its drawbacks and research continued.

The next lighting breakthrough happened in 1962, when Nick Holonyak, Jr created the first LED while working for GE. These historical developments during the mid-twentieth century drove LED and fluorescent lighting to revolutionize energy efficient lighting into the products we know today.

While LEDs have been in development for over 50 years, fluorescents maintain a stronghold in the lighting market. Improvements to the efficacy (lumens per watt) of LEDs over time, along with a drop in cost, have made these solutions a viable option for many commercial or industrial lighting projects. Facility managers now have to determine, when installing new or upgrading existing fixtures, which do they prefer: LED or fluorescent lighting? There are certain characteristics to take into consideration when choosing between the two:

 

LEDs VS. FLUORESCENTS

Efficiency

LEDs are the most energy-efficient and rapidly developing lighting technologies we have today. Because LEDs emit light in a very narrow band of wavelengths, they are far more energy efficient than incandescent or fluorescent lights, which emit light in a much wider band of wavelengths.

The system efficiency of fluorescent lights are much lower than LEDs due to all of the losses associated with omnidirectional light output and the need to redirect it to a desired area. This means that only 60-70% of the actual light being given off by the fluorescent lamps is being used. 



Lifespan

LEDs last longer than any light source that’s commercially available. LEDs themselves can have a general lifespan of up to 200,000 hours, and it is typically the driver that will need to be replaced at around 70,000 hours.  Technological advancements are increasing these numbers every day.

Typical lifespan values for fluorescent lighting range from 7,000 hours to 50,000 hours before a lamp or ballast requires replacement.



Lifetime Costs

The initial cost of LEDs will be higher than fluorescents, but it continues to drop over the lamp’s lifespan. With reduced maintenance costs over time and lower electricity costs due to their energy efficiency, LEDs provide a fast payback compared to fluorescents.

Fluorescent lights are relatively cheap to purchase but are usually more expensive to maintain. In order to attain the equivalent lifespan of a single LED light, fluorescent bulbs will likely need to be replaced several times, resulting in high material and installation labor costs that greatly reduce overall savings.



Maintenance Costs

LEDs have far fewer instances of breakage or other physical damage because of their durability. The frequency that the lamps have to be changed out is also very low because of their long lifespan.

Fluorescent bulbs require regular replacement, in addition to the labor cost to monitor and replace aging or expired components.



Cycling (turning on/off) and Dimming

There is no warming up or cooling down period for LEDs, so turning them on and off doesn’t waste energy. The advanced technology of LEDs also allows for dimming from 100% of the light to .5%, which conserves additional energy beyond the fixture replacement.

Fluorescents have a short delay when turning on and require some time to warm up before the tube is illuminating to its maximum capacity. Older CFLs (compact fluorescent lights) are often not suitable for dimming, while newer ones allow for dimming down to about 15% of their normal light.



Directionality

LEDs emit light over a 180 degree area. This is an advantage because light is usually desired over a target area rather than the 360 degrees around the bulb.

Fluorescent light is omnidirectional, which means it emits light across 360 degrees.   Much of this light gets lost inside the fixture, causing a lower fixture efficiency when compared to LED.


 LEDs: The Clear Choice

It’s hard to beat the value offered by modern LED lighting. Not only are their prices becoming more affordable every day, they also last up to decades longer and use far less power while providing better illumination than the alternative. Compared to fluorescents, LED technology is a paradigm shift, not only because the solution is more efficient but because of the way it produces light.

See the dramatic results when fluorescents are replaced by LEDs in a recent project of ours at The Campus at Marlborough. Through this lighting retrofit, Fairbanks Energy saves the campus over 870,550 kWh a year! Read more here >>

 

Where should you be installing LEDs in the buildings you manage?

Contact us today to upgrade your lighting to  LED and start saving money and energy >>>

Topics: LED lighting